Total score of the scale: the sum of the scores from the 24 individual items (ranging from 0 - 120)
Total score of the subscale comprehensive evaluation: the total score of the 5 subscales (items 7, 12, 16, 21, and 24) (ranging from 0 - 25)
Subscale comprehensive evaluation: the individual scores from the 5 subscales (5 scores)
Result types: According to the author's recommendations, the schizophrenia can be further classified according to the results of SANS and SAPS. If the total evaluation score of the subscales ≥ 3, it is called the "prominent symptom group," and then based on the relevant positive and negative "prominent symptom groups" and their combinations, it is classified into 3 types:
① Positive symptom predominant type. There is one or more prominent positive symptom groups, with no prominent negative symptom groups.
② Negative symptom predominant type. There are two or more prominent negative symptom groups, with no prominent positive symptom groups.
③ Mixed type: does not meet the criteria of either ① or ②.
In 1982, N. Andreasen in the USA developed the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) due to the need to study schizophrenia with predominant negative and positive symptoms. SANS addresses the previous shortcomings in psychiatric assessment scales concerning negative symptoms.
The 24 items of SANS are divided into 5 subscales: 1. Flat or blunted affect; 2. Poverty of thought; 3. Lack of volition; 4. Lack of interest or social engagement; 5. Attention disorder.
The scoring is based on a 6-point scale: (0) None, normal or increased; (1) Suspicious; (2) Mild, exists but is mild; (3) Moderate; (4) Significant; (5) Severe. Each item has specific assessment criteria. SANS is assessed over the past month. For pharmacological research, it can be shortened to one week.
Generally, a natural clinical psychiatric examination method is used for communication. Initially, based on previous materials and clinical experience, determine a topic that the patient is most likely to engage in to introduce the examination.